Geology and Soil Mechanics, UW-Stout

Quantifying Risk and Radiation

wpe3.gif (2171 bytes)

    To understand how radiation damages biological organisms, we must understand what factors go into the measurement of a Sievert, Sv, (or rem - roentgen-man-equivalent).  Either of these measurements can be used to quantify amounts of biological damage received by radiation.   In essence,

Sievert (Sv) = (energy deposited per mass of organism) x (relative biological effectiveness or RBE)

more appropriately written as

Sievert (Sv) = (Gray) x (Quality Factor).

1 Sv = 100 rem, 1 Gray = 1 J/kg, and the quality factors

High Energy Photons Beta Protons Alpha Fast Neutrons Slow Neutrons
Q-factor 1 1 10 20 10 3

which depend on the type of radiation.  This indicates that alpha particles are 20 times more damaging than beta particles given the same amount of energy deposited per mass.  The measurement of the Gray can be further broken down into the following factors:

(activity of source) x (energy of each particle in source) x (energy transferred to organism at this particle energy) x (shielding material)-1 x (distance from source)-2.

So what does all this mean and how can we put it into useful terms?

General Effects:
    2.5 mSv/yr is the natural background exposure (average).  Note:   1000 mSv = 1 Sv
    5 mSv/yr is the maximum permissible dose-equivalent
    ~ 1 or 2 Sv causes acute symptoms (loss of hair, bleeding, etc.)
    ~ 4 Sv  results in death with a probability of 50%
    > 10 Sv is lethal

Assuming a linear proportionality between risk and dose, 1 mSv increases the risk of lethal leukemia and cancer by about 50 microrisks.  In other words, out of 1 million people exposed to this radiation, 50 of those people will die from this exposure sometime during their life.

1 mSv (exposure) = 50 microrisks

Additional Information about Radiation

Breakdown of the total radiation exposure for the average U.S. citizen
    ~ 0.45 mSv (18%) Non-natural sources - nuclear medicine, medical x-rays, fallout, nuclear power, etc.   
    ~ 2.05 mSv (82%) Natural sources - Radon from the ground, Cosmic rays, rocks and soil, internal consumption, etc.  It is important to note that radon accounts for 55% of the average total exposure to radiation from all sources.

Comparing "Risky" Activity
(information from R. Wilson, Comparing Risks, Physics and Society, October 1990, p. 3-5)

Activities Carrying an Average Risk of Death of One Part per Million (1 microrisk)

Activity Cause(s) of death
Ionizing Radiation
   One Chest x-ray at a good hospital
   Traveling cross-country once by jet
   Living 1 week in a building
   Living 2 months in Denver
   Living 50 yrs within 5 mi of nuclear power plant

Cancer from ionizing radiation
Cancer from cosmic ionizing radiation
Cancer from indoor radon
Cancer from cosmic ionizing radiation
Accident
Internal Consumption
   Smoking 1.4 cigarettes
   Living 2 months with a smoker
   Drinking 0.5 liters of wine
   Drinking 30 12-ounce cans of diet soda
   Eating 100 charcoal broiled steaks

Cancer and heart disease
Cancer and heart disease
Cirrhosis of the liver
Cancer from saccharin
Cancer from benzopyrene
Travel
   3 miles by motorcycle
   10 miles by bicycle
   30 miles by car
   1000 miles by commercial airplane
   6000 miles (cross-country) by jet

Accident
Accident
Accident
Accident
Cancer from cosmic ionizing radiation
Work
   Spending 1 hour in a coal mine
   Spending 3 hours in a coal mine

Black lung disease
Accident
Other
   Living 2 days in New York or Boston

Air Pollution


Analysis of Linear, No-Threshold (LNT)

    It should be noted that quantifying the health risks of low level exposures to radon gas has been difficult. Public policy has traditionally followed the linear, no threshold model. This model simply states that the more exposure (no matter what level) the higher your health risks. Scientific studies on laboratory rats and atomic bomb survivors (Hiroshima and Nagasaki) suggest that a very small exposure may reduce your health risks!

"This article presents arguments and data from rodents and humans to support the thesis that low level radiation (<0.2 Gy) may be beneficial to the health of the exposed individual."1    

"...low dose irradiation has been shown to ... trigger ...adaptive responses ... to protect ... biologically important molecules including DNA in the exposed tissue, irrespective of the cause of such damage."1

"Several recent epidemiologic studies with high statistical significance have reported that exposure to low or intermediate levels of radiation are associated with decreased mortality and/or decreased incidence of cancer..."2

Are you radioactive?

Consider an average 75 kg person who has 75x1026 total atoms
    10% (by weight) is H, 3H/1H=10-17, or 45 billion 3H atoms, Activity = 100 decays/sec
    60% is O
    20% is C, 14C/12C=10-12, Activity = 3000 decays/sec
Carbon 14 is continously generated by cosmic rays hitting the atmosphere
    5.4% is N
    1.3% is P
    1.3% is Ca
    0.5% is S
    0.3% is K, 40K/K=10-4, or about 30x1020 radioactive 40K, Activity = 5500 decays/sec
40K was generated in supernova explosions before the solar system was formed
    0.02% Rb, 87Rb/Rb=0.28, or about 25x1020 radioactive 87Rb, Activity = 100 decays/sec

40K are the most abundant and energetic.  2/3 of all the decay energy escapes the body, 1/3 gets absorbed into the body giving us a dose-equivalent of 0.15 mSv/year.  Adding 14C we get 0.18 mSv/year.  The striking conclusion is that 1 person in every 2,000 will be killed by their own radiation sometime during their life (assuming LNT).

The average man irradiates his wife with about 5 nanosieverts every night.  "...A thousand and one happy nights can give her 0.005 mSv.  In this happy way she takes about 1/4 microrisk equivalent to the risk from five pulls on a cigarette!  Is it worth taking?  (Let me inform you that a pull on a cigarette would shorten your life expectancy by 25 seconds, but a virgin lifestyle would shorten your life expectancy by about eight years according to the statistics.)"3

Related Web Links
Radiation Related Rules, Regulations and Laws
Radiation Effects Research Foundation
International Atomic Energy Agency
National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements


Sources:

1L.E. Feinendegen, V.P. Bond, C.A. Sondhaus, Can Low Level Radiation Protect Against Cancer?, Physics and Society, v27 (April 1998)

2Myron Pollycove, M.D., The Rise and Fall of the Linear No-Threshold (LNT) Theory of Radiation Carcinogenesis, Physics and Society, v27 (April 1998)

Art Hobson, Physics: Concepts and Connections, Prentice Hall (1995)

W.R. Leo, Techniques for Nuclear and Particle Physics Experiments, Springer-Verlag (1987, p. 65)

3G. Marx, Risks of Radioactivity, Physics Education, v28 (March 1993), p 121-125


For questions or comments regarding these pages contact Dr. Alan Scott / scotta@uwstout.edu / this page was last updated April 05, 2000